Compare Mercedes C-Class Estate S206 vs Volvo V60 II vs Volvo V70 II facelift
Variants
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.4 140PS
2.4 140PS AT
2.4 140PS Bi-Fuel
2.4 140PS Bi-Fuel AT
2.4 170PS
2.4 170PS AT
2.4D 126PS
2.4D 163PS
2.4D 163PS AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
D5 185PS
D5 185PS AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
T5
T5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
485 L / 17.1 cu-ft ~ 1641 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1804 mm / 71.0 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2755 mm / 108.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.29
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6d
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
9
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
62%
50%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- Good suspension setup
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Much better looking
- More powerful I5 engines
- New transmission options
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.