Compare Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Peugeot 307 SW vs Peugeot 308 SW III

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) Combi Station Wagon (2019)

Peugeot 307 SW Station Wagon (2002-2005)

Peugeot 308 SW III (P5) Station Wagon (2021)

Skoda | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 TSI

1.0 TSI DSG

1.4 PHEV 204 DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 130 DSG

1.5 TSI 150

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 116

2.0 TDI 116 DSG

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG

2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG

1.6

1.6 AT

1.6 HDI

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0 HDi 107PS

2.0 HDi 90PS

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

340 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1540 L / 54.4 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

14.3 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

13.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion bar

Semi-independent, Torsion

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

142 mm / 5.6 in

Size | Height

1444 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4419 mm / 174.0 in

4636 mm / 182.5 in

Size | Width

1757 mm / 69.2 in

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1505.0 mm / 59.3 in

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1510.0 mm / 59.4 in

Wheel Size

15 in

Wheelbase

2708 mm / 106.6 in

2732 mm / 107.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.277

Electric Range

70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

36%

31%

Pros

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Easy to fix

Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Ugly
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.