Compare Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon facelift vs Toyota Corolla Touring Sports E210

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.0 Valvematic
2.2 D-4D 150hp
2.2 D-CAT 150hp
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
1.2 Turbo
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4780 mm / 188.2 in
4650 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
157 ~ 159 g/km
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
36%
26%
60%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Superb styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Exceptional reliability
  • Independent suspensions
Cons
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Worse styling than pre-facelift
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.