Compare Volvo V60 II vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Audi A6 Avant C8
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI ultra DCT
45 TFSI ultra quattro DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI quattro DCT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4939 mm / 194.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2924 mm / 115.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
36%
74%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Superb styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Engine downsizing
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.