Compare Volvo V60 II vs Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 508 SW
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2021
2010 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
31%
21%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Much better-looking than the 407 SW
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.