Compare Volvo V60 II vs Volvo V50 (M) facelift vs Volvo V50 (M)

Volvo V60 II

Volvo V50 (M) facelift

Volvo V50 (M)

Volvo V60 IIVolvo V50 (M) faceliftVolvo V50 (M)
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.6
1.6D DRIVe
1.6D DRIVe start/stop
1.8F Flexifuel
2.0D
2.0F Flexifuel
2.4
D5 AT
D5
2.4i AT
2.4i
T5 AT
T5 AWD AT
T5 AWD
T5
1.6D
1.6
1.8
2.0D
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5
T5 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%34%28%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • More elegant styling
  • Good T5 and D5 engines
  • New R-Design trim
  • Down to very low fuel consumption
  • Clean and simple design
  • Rather reliable drivetrain
  • Manual transmission widely available
  • Wonderful T5 engine
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Not very powerful
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.