HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 508 SW

Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
0.277
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Production

Availability
2020
2021
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
31%
21%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Much better-looking than the 407 SW
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.