HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon facelift 2 vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift

Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.6 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.0 Valvematic CVT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
0.29
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 6 W
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2020
2015 ~ 2018
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
31%
30%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Reliable powertrain
  • Improved exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.