Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 2 Wagon vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.6 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i AT
2.0 VTT-i
2.0 D-4D
2.0 VTT-i AT
2.2 D-4D 148hp
2.2 D-4D 175hp
2.4 VVT-i
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1500 L / 53.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.1 m / 33.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1525 mm / 60.0 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4700 mm / 185.0 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6 W
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
2015 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
18%
30%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Small turning circle
- Rather reliable
- Very low fuel consumption
- Superb reliability
- More modern design
Cons
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspensions setup
- Design hasn't aged well
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.