Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Skoda Octavia 2 Combi
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.4 MPI 75PS
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 FSI AT
1.8 TFSI
1.9 TDI
1.9 TDI 4x4
1.9 TDI AT
1.9 TDI DSG
2.0 FSI
2.0 FSI 4x4
2.0 FSI AT
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI 4x4
2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TSI
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Volkswagen A5
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4572 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1769 mm / 69.6 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2578 mm / 101.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
36%
20%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- RS models not too bad
- Rather well-priced
Cons
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with a basic suspension setup
- Somewhat ugly
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.