Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs BMW 3 Series Touring G21 vs BMW 3 Series Touring F31 LCI
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320e xDrive AT
320i AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330d MHEV AT
330d MHEV xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i xDrive AT
316d
316d AT
318d
318d AT
318d xDrive
318i
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d Efficient Dynamics
320d Efficient Dynamics AT
320d xDrive
320d xDrive AT
320i
320i AT
320i xDrive
320i xDrive AT
325d B47
325d B47 AT
325d N47
325d N47 AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330i
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
335d xDrive AT
340i AT
340i xDrive AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
495 L / 17.5 cu-ft ~ 1500 L / 53.0 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4633 mm / 182.4 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2810 mm / 110.6 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
75%
70%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Good performance
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Highly competitive in its class
- Improved suspension setup
- Much improved engine lineup
- Slightly better styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Complex emission control systems
- MacPherson front suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.