Compare Peugeot 508 SW II vs Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 308 SW II

Variants
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GT
PSE
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.5 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1420 mm / 55.9 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
51%
31%
15%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior appointment
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Not ugly anymore
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.