HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW 3 Series Touring G21 vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift

Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320e xDrive AT
320i AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330d MHEV AT
330d MHEV xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i xDrive AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST
ST AT
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
118 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM

Production

Availability
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
75%
38%
37%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Highly competitive in its class
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Decent build quality
  • Not very ugly
  • Independent suspension setup
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
Cons
  • Complex emission control systems
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Further downsized engine lineup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.