Compare BMW 3 Series Touring G21 vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon

BMW 3 Series Touring G21 Station Wagon (2019)

Ford Focus 4 (C519) facelift Station Wagon (2022)

BMW | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

318d

318d AT

318i AT

320d

320d AT

320d xDrive AT

320e AT

320e xDrive AT

320i AT

330d AT

330d xDrive AT

330d MHEV AT

330d MHEV xDrive AT

330e AT

330e xDrive AT

330i AT

330i xDrive AT

M340d xDrive AT

M340i xDrive AT

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV AT

1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV AT

1.5 EcoBlue 120

1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT

1.5 EcoBlue 95

ST AT

1.0 EcoBoost

1.5 EcoBoost

1.5 EcoBoost AT

1.5 TDCi

1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

1.6 TDCi

1.6 TDCi ECOnetic

2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT

2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT

2.0 TDCi 150PS

2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD

2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic

2.0 TDCi 150PS AT

2.0 TDCi 180PS

2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic

2.0 TDCi 180PS AT

2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT

2.0 TDCi 210PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

62.5 L / 16.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19

Turning Circle

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

118 mm / 4.6 in

128 mm / 5.0 in

Size | Height

1501 mm / 59.1 in

Size | Length

4867 mm / 191.6 in

Size | Width

1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1567.0 mm / 61.7 in

1599.0 mm / 63.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1556.0 mm / 61.3 in

1595.0 mm / 62.8 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19

Wheelbase

2851 mm / 112.2 in

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2850 mm / 112.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6d-ISC-FCM

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score

75%

38%

32%

Pros

Good performance
Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Highly competitive in its class
Improved suspension setup

Decent build quality
Not very ugly
Independent suspension setup

Low official fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Complex emission control systems

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Engines are too small
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.