Compare BMW 3 Series Touring G21 vs Volvo V60 facelift vs Saab 9-3 SportCombi 2

Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320e xDrive AT
320i AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330d MHEV AT
330d MHEV xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i xDrive AT
D2
D2
D2 AT
D2 AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
D5 231PS AWD Hybrid
D6 285PS AWD Hybrid
D6 288PS AWD Hybrid
Polestar 2.0 T6 AWD AT
Polestar 3.0 T6 AWD AT
T2 AT
T3 150PS
T3 150PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 240PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 2.0 AT
T6 2.0 AWD AT
T6 3.0 AWD AT
1.8i
1.8t 150PS
1.8t 150PS AT
1.8t BioPower
1.9 TiD 120PS
1.9 TiD 150PS
1.9 TTiD 180PS
1.9 TTiD 180PS AT
2.0T
2.0t 150PS
2.0t 150PS AT
2.0t 175PS
2.0t 175PS AT
2.0T AT
2.0t BioPower 200PS
2.0t BioPower 200PS AT
2.8T V6 230PS
2.8T V6 250PS
2.8T V6 250PS AT
2.8T V6 280PS
2.8T V6 280PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1273 L / 45.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1507 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4654 mm / 183.2 in
Size | Width
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
75%
37%
65%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Highly competitive in its class
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Nice Polestar exterior design
  • Very handsome styling
  • Superb blend of elegance and sportiness
  • Rather potent engines
  • Good manual transmissions
Cons
  • Complex emission control systems
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Losing I5 and I6 engines
  • Lowered engine reliability
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.