Compare Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260 facelift vs BMW 5 Series Touring F11 LCI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260
Variants
20d
20d AWD
25t
30t AWD
518d
518d AT
518d
518d AT
520d N47
520d N47 AT
520d N47 xDrive AT
520d B47
520d B47 AT
520d B47 xDrive AT
520i
520i AT
525d
525d AT
525d xDrive AT
528i
528i AT
528i xDrive AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
535d AT
535d xDrive AT
535i
535i AT
535i xDrive AT
550i AT
M550d xDrive AT
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD AT
2.0d 163PS
2.0d 163PS AT
2.0d 180PS AT
2.0d 180PS AWD AT
2.0d 240PS AWD AT
20d AT
20d AWD AT
25d AWD AT
25t AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.0d AT
30d AWD AT
30t AWD AT
E-Performance
E-Performance AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
565 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 37.9 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
141 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
1462 mm / 57.6 in
1496 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4964 mm / 195.4 in
4955 mm / 195.1 in
Size | Width
2089 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1982 mm / 78.0 in (mirror folded)
1860 mm / 73.2 in
1987 mm / 78.2 in | 2091 mm / 82.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
1626.0 mm / 64.0 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2968 mm / 116.9 in
2960 mm / 116.5 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
61%
70%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great styling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Slightly improved styling
- Up-rated engines (even less reliable?)
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good towing capacity
- Beautiful design (though barely updated)
- Manual transmission more widely available
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Long-term reliability concerns
- Plasticky
- Unreliable engines
- Question on long-term engine reliability
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.