Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs BMW i3 I01 vs Fiat New 500e

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender
24kWh
42kWh
42kWh 3+1 door

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
185 L / 6.5 cu-ft ~ 550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum, 203x28 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
9.7 m / 31.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1578 mm / 62.1 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
3999 mm / 157.4 in
3632 mm / 143.0 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1683 mm / 66.3 in | 1900 mm / 74.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2322 mm / 91.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
6%
20%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Good styling
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Poor performance
  • Plasticky
  • Low build quality
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • EV nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.