HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Fiat 500L Living

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 80
1.3 MultiJet II 85
1.4 T-Jet
1.6 MultiJet 105
1.6 MultiJet 120

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1667 mm / 65.6 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4352 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1784 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
27%
22%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • Decent exterior design
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.