Compare Fiat New 500e vs Ford Fiesta 7 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
24kWh
42kWh
42kWh 3+1 door
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
185 L / 6.5 cu-ft ~ 550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
4
5
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum, 203x28 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
9.7 m / 31.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
3632 mm / 143.0 in
Size | Width
1683 mm / 66.3 in | 1900 mm / 74.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2322 mm / 91.4 in
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
19%
25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Plasticky
  • Low build quality
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • EV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.