Compare Toyota Corolla 12 Hatchback vs Toyota Matrix 2 vs Toyota Auris
Variants
1.2 D-4T AWD CVT
1.2 D-4T CVT
1.2 D-4T
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0
2.0 Hybrid
Automatic
AWD Automatic
Manual
1.3
1.33
1.4 D-4D 90
1.4 D-4D Euro5
1.4
1.6 132 Euro5
1.6 132
1.6 124 AT
1.6 124
1.8
1.8 Euro5
Hybrid
2.0 D-4D 126 Euro5
2.0 D-4D 126
2.0 D-4D 90
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT Euro5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1398 L / 49.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 295 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 277 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
205/55 R16 89H
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Length
4394 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
1.5 km / 0.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine
2AZ-FE I4
Engine | Bore
88.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.1 cu-in / 2362.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.7 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
24%
33%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- High reliability
- Good build quality
- Independent suspensions
- Decent exterior design
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Rather good exterior design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- V6 only available in Japan
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.