Compare Kia Rio 4 facelift vs Hyundai i30 II vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift

Variants
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 DCT
1.2 84
1.4
1.4 CRDi
1.4 CRDi Euro6
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 110
1.6 CRDi 110 AT
1.6 CRDi 110 DCT
1.6 CRDi 128
1.6 CRDi 128 AT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDI 135
1.6 GDI 135 AT
1.6 GDI 135 Euro6
1.6 GDI 135 Euro6 DCT
1.6 MPI 120
1.6 MPI 120 AT
1.6 T-GDI
1.8
1.8 AT
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 1103 L / 39.0 cu-ft
378 L / 13.3 cu-ft ~ 1316 L / 46.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4340 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 1993 mm / 78.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
39%
32%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Fully independent suspension setup
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.