Compare Ford Focus 4 facelift vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Hyundai i20

Ford Focus 4 (C519) facelift Hatchback (2022)

Hyundai i30 III (PD) facelift Hatchback (2020)

Ford | Cars

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 155

1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT

1.5 EcoBlue 120

1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT

1.5 EcoBlue 95

ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280

ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT

1.0 T-GDi

1.0 T-GDi DCT

1.5 DPi

1.5 T-GDi

1.5 T-GDi DCT

1.6 CRDi 115

1.6 CRDi 115 DCT

1.6 CRDi 136

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

i30 N Performance

i30 N Performance DCT

1.1 CRDi

1.2 78

1.2 86

1.4

1.4 AT

1.4 Euro5

1.4 Euro5 AT

1.4 CRDi 75

1.4 CRDi 90 Euro5

1.4 CRDi 90

1.6

1.6 AT

1.6 CRDi 116

1.6 CRDi 128

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 345 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 314 mm

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Tire Size

235/35 R19 Y

Turning Circle

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

11.7 m / 38.2 ft

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

150 mm / 5.9 in

Size | Height

1490 mm / 58.7 in

Size | Length

4340 mm / 170.9 in

3940 mm / 155.1 in

Size | Width

1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)

1795 mm / 70.7 in

1710 mm / 67.3 in

Track Width | Front

1567.0 mm / 61.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1556.0 mm / 61.3 in

Wheel Size

8.0J x 19

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2650 mm / 104.3 in

2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6d-ISC-FCM

Engine | Bore

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

9.5:1

Engine | Stroke

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability

2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

32%

14%

Pros

Good handling
Decent build quality

Decent build quality
Decent performance
Good handling

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle
Decent exterior design

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Generic styling

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tinyengines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.