Compare Citroen C4 III (C41) vs Volvo XC40 vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Citroen C4 III (C41)

Volvo XC40

Citroen C5 Aircross

Citroen C4 III (C41)Volvo XC40Citroen C5 Aircross
Variants
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score15%32%15%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.