Compare Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen C1 II 3-door vs Citroen C2

Citroen C3 III facelift

Citroen C1 II 3-door

Citroen C2

Citroen C3 III faceliftCitroen C1 II 3-doorCitroen C2
Variants
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125

Reviews

Neofiliac score8%12%3%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.