Compare Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen C3 III vs Citroen C4 Coupe

Citroen C3 III facelift

Citroen C3 III

Citroen C4 Coupe

Citroen C3 III faceliftCitroen C3 IIICitroen C4 Coupe
Variants
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.2 110 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 110 AT
1.2 68
1.2 68 Euro6d
1.2 82 Euro6d
1.2 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0
VTS 2.0

Reviews

Neofiliac score8%8%13%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugliness in the black plastic flavor
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.