Compare Citroen AMI vs Renault Twizy vs Renault Twingo III facelift
Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
2
2
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
7.2 m / 23.6 ft
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
5.5 kWh (gross)
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1520 mm / 59.8 in
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
2410 mm / 94.9 in
2338 mm / 92.0 in
Size | Width
1390 mm / 54.7 in
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
485.0 kg / 1069.2 lbs
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
8 hp / 6.0 kW
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
28%
3%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Cute styling
- Very small turning circle
- Fun looks
- Very small turning circle
Cons
- More like a toy
- Slower than a golf cart
- Not a real car
- Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Very little cargo space
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.