Compare Renault Twizy vs Citroen AMI vs Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Passengers
2
2
5
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
7.2 m / 23.6 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
5.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1520 mm / 59.8 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
2410 mm / 94.9 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1390 mm / 54.7 in
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
485.0 kg / 1069.2 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
8 hp / 6.0 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2012
2020
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
17%
8%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Fun looks
- Very small turning circle
- Cute styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Not a real car
- Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Very little cargo space
- More like a toy
- Slower than a golf cart
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.