Compare Renault Twizy vs Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twingo III facelift
Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
2
5
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
4166 mm / 164.0 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
0.308
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
17%
3%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Fun looks
- Notable improvement in range
- Very small turning circle
Cons
- Not a real car
- Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Very little cargo space
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugly
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.