HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio V vs Renault Twizy vs Peugeot 208 II

Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Passengers
5
2
5
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Elastic beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
6.1 kWh (gross)
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
2338 mm / 92.0 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
28%
16%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.