Compare Renault Clio V vs Renault Megane 3 Coupe vs Renault Clio III

Renault Clio V

Renault Megane 3 Coupe

Renault Clio III

Renault Clio VRenault Megane 3 CoupeRenault Clio III
Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110 CVT
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 Euro6
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
1.2 TCe 115
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 TCe 180
2.0 TCe 190
2.0 TCe 220
RS 265
RS 250
RS Trophy
RS Trophy-R
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score19%37%9%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Interesting Megane RS
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Awkward styling
  • Poor interiors
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.