Compare Peugeot 308 III vs Peugeot 208 vs Nissan Micra 4

Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13) Hatchback (2010-2017)

Peugeot | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

1.2

1.2 CVT

1.2 DIG-S

1.2 DIG-S CVT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

41.0 L / 10.8 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Disc

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

9.3 m / 30.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Form Factor

3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1525 mm / 60.0 in

Size | Length

4367 mm / 171.9 in

Size | Width

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

1470.0 mm / 57.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

Wheelbase

2675 mm / 105.3 in

2538 mm / 99.9 in

2450 mm / 96.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.2 L / 73.1 cu-in / 1198.0 cc

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Transmission | Type

Manual

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

26%

13%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Small turning circle
Low fuel consumption

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.