HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 308 III vs Audi A3 Sportback 8V facelift vs Peugeot 308 III

Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DCT
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
e-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
g-tron 1.4 TFSI
g-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Torsion

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.4 kWh (gross)
8.8 kWh (gross) | 7.0 kWh (net)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4367 mm / 171.9 in
4367 mm / 171.9 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
EB2DTS
EB2DTS
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2021
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
42%
26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Manual transmission widely available
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny or small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions in FWD models
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.