HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 108 vs Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 308

Variants
1.0 68
1.0 68 AT
1.0 72
1.0 72 AT
1.2 82
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 VTi 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 e-HDI 115
1.6 HDI 92
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 THP 125
1.6 THP 156
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT
2.0 e-HDI 150
2.0 e-HDI 150 AT
GT 1.6 THP 205
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GTi 263
GTi 250
GTi 270
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
3475 mm / 136.8 in
4253 mm / 167.4 in
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Track Width | Front
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
21%
18%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Engine durability low
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.