Compare Peugeot 508 II (R83) vs Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift vs Peugeot 508

Peugeot 508 II (R83)

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Peugeot 508

Peugeot 508 II (R83)Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) faceliftPeugeot 508
Variants
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
1.6 PSE AWD AT
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.6 e-HDi 115 6MT
1.6 HDi 115 5MT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.2 HDi 204 AT
HYbrid4
THP 155 6MT
THP 155 AT
VTi 120

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%42%16%
Pros
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior quality
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Short full-electric range
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design
  • Unreliable Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.