Compare BMW i3 LCI vs Fiat 500e vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
33.2 kWh
33.2 kWh Range Extender
42.2 kWh
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
198 L / 7.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 279.4x22.1 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 238.76x10.16 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 185/55 R15 Rear wheel tires: 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
9.5 m / 31.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
24.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1598 mm / 62.9 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
4011 mm / 157.9 in
3617 mm / 142.4 in
Size | Width
1628 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1407.0 mm / 55.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1397.0 mm / 55.0 in
Weight
1352.0 kg / 2980.7 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 5.5J x 15 Rear wheel rims: 6.5J x 15
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2301 mm / 90.6 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.311
0.362
Top Speed
142.0 km/h / 88.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
113 hp / 84.3 kW
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
15%
25%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Cute exterior design
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Very, very ugly
  • Nonsense positioning
  • Greenwashing
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space
  • Questionable battery degradation
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.