Compare Opel Astra L vs Peugeot 308 III vs Peugeot 308
Variants
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.5d 130
1.5d 130 AT
1.6 Turbo 180 PHEV
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.4 kWh (gross)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4374 mm / 172.2 in
4367 mm / 171.9 in
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.28
Electric Range
66.0 km / 41.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Production
Availability
2021
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
26%
18%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.