HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Fabia 4 vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Skoda Scala

Variants
1.0 MPI 65
1.0 MPI 80
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
1.0
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
Edition S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1190 L / 42.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.1 deg
13.8 deg
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.5 deg
16.5 deg
14.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Threaded twist beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
138 mm / 5.4 in
134 mm / 5.3 in
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1459 mm / 57.4 in
1471 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4108 mm / 161.7 in
4362 mm / 171.7 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1954 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1706 mm / 67.2 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.278 ~ 0.315

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AP
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
8%
12%
Pros
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Very poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Very basic suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling and comfort

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.