HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Kadjar vs SEAT Arona facelift vs Renault Captur

Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
1.0 TGI 90
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1552 mm / 61.1 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4153 mm / 163.5 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2566 mm / 101.0 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6 AP
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
11%
1%
Pros
  • Basic offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • CMiserably low engine output
  • Poor build quality
  • Horrible styling
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor handling
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.