Compare Renault Kadjar vs Peugeot 2008 vs Renault Captur
Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
4%
2%
1%
Pros
- Basic offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Easy to fix
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CMiserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- Horrible styling
- Very ugly indeed
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.