HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Soul 3 vs Peugeot 2008 II vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift

Variants
1.6 GDI DCT
2.0 MPI
2.0 MPI CVT
e-Soul 39.2 kWh
e-Soul 67 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.2 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.6 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
236 mm / 9.3 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1844 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
42.0 m / 137.8 ft
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
21%
24%
Pros
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.