Compare Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV vs Skoda Kodiaq vs Acura RDX

Variants
60
80
80X
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
2.3
2.3 AWD pre-facelift
2.3 AWD facelift

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft ~ 1004 L / 35.5 cu-ft
787 L / 27.8 cu-ft ~ 1716 L / 60.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Payload
642 kg / 1415 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
18.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1622 mm / 63.9 in
Size | Length
4653 mm / 183.2 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2148 mm / 84.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.234
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
195.0 km/h / 121.2 mph

Powertrain

Engine
K23A1
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.3 L / 140.4 cu-in / 2300.0 cc
Engine | Power
240.0 hp / 179.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
104.3 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
42%
42%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Greenwashing
  • Bland and sterile
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.