Compare Volvo C40 Recharge vs Volvo XC40 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
413 L / 14.6 cu-ft ~ 1205 L / 42.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 345x30 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 340x20 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
235/60 R17, 235/55 R18, 235/50 R19, 245/45 R20, 245/40 R21
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
78.0 kWh (gross) | 75.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Crossover
Platform
TNGA: GA-B

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1582 mm / 62.3 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4431 mm / 174.4 in
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2035 mm / 80.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Weight
2185.0 kg / 4817.1 lbs
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 19, 8J x 20, 8J x 21
18 in
Wheelbase
2702 mm / 106.4 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.7 sec
Electric Range
420.0 km / 261.0 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
204 hp / 152.1 kW @ 4350-13900 rpm
Engine | Stroke
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
2020
Debut
2020-04-23
Made In
Japan, France

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
32%
9%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to 420km electric range
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic equipment
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor handling
  • Bland

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.