Compare Volvo C40 Recharge vs Peugeot 2008 II (P24) vs Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Volvo C40 Recharge

Peugeot 2008 II (P24)

Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Volvo C40 RechargePeugeot 2008 II (P24)Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score20%21%24%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to 420km electric range
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.