Compare DS 3 Crossback vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift vs Peugeot 2008

Variants
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1050 L / 37.1 cu-ft
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 47.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
236 mm / 9.3 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1534 mm / 60.4 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4118 mm / 162.1 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2558 mm / 100.7 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in

Performance

Electric Range
430.0 km / 267.2 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
YH01
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor handling
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.