Compare Audi A8 D5 facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 vs Audi A4 B9 facelift

Variants
50 TDI
55 TFSI
60 TFSI e
60 TFSI
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI DCT
40 TDI ultra DCT
40 TDI ultra quattro DCT
40 TFSI 190 DCT
40 TFSI 204 DCT
40 TFSI (204 Hp) quattro ultra MHEV S tronic
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro ultra DCT
50 TDI quattro AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.0 deg
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Length
4762 mm / 187.5 in
Size | Width
1945 mm / 76.6 in | 2130 mm / 83.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1847 mm / 72.7 in | 2022 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic tiptronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
81%
37%
63%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Sleek styling (in SWB)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent performance
  • Good suspension setup
Cons
  • Too many gizmos
  • Engine keeps getting smaller
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Unreliable drivetrain
  • Loaded with electronic nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.