Compare Toyota Camry 8 vs Toyota Camry 6 vs Toyota Avalon 1
Variants
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
9.3 L / 9.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R15 H
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
127 mm / 5.0 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1470.0 kg / 3240.8 lbs
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.7 cu-in / 2994.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
284 Nm / 209.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2009
1994 ~ 2000
Reviews
Neofiliac score
44%
42%
17%
Pros
- High reliability
- Good comfort
- Decent handling
- Robust engine options
- Proven to be exceptionally reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very reliable V6 engine
- Clean styling
Cons
- Bland styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Boring
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.