Compare Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177 vs Ford Focus 2 Sedan vs Ford Taurus 5
Variants
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT
1.4
1.6 100hp AT
1.6 100hp
1.6 115hp
1.6D 90hp
1.6D 109hp
1.8 125hp
1.8D
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0D
FWD
AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4549 mm / 179.1 in
4488 mm / 176.7 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
15 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
18%
21%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Uninspiring exterior and interior
- Poor handling
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.