Compare Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift Sedan (2019)

Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift Sedan (2019-2022)

Skoda | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

1.5 TSI

1.5 TSI DSG

1.6 TDI DSG

2.0 TDI 122 DSG

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG

2.0 TDI 190 DSG

2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG

2.0 TDI 200 DSG

2.0 TSI 190 DSG

2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG

2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG

1.4 TSI PHEV

1.5 EcoBoost 165

1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 150

2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT

1.0T

1.5T

1.5T AT

1.5D

1.5D Econetic

1.6D

1.6D Econetic

2.0T 203hp AT

2.0T 240hp AT

Hybrid

2.0D 150hp

2.0D 150hp AWD

2.0D 150hp Econetic

2.0D 150hp AT

2.0D 180hp

2.0D 180hp Econetic

2.0D 180hp AT

2.0D 180hp AWD AT

2.0D 210hp AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

10.5 L / 11.1 qt

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.8 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18

215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

12.4 m / 40.7 ft

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

1.4 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

128 mm / 5.0 in

Size | Height

1482 mm / 58.3 in

Size | Length

4869 mm / 191.7 in

4871 mm / 191.8 in

Size | Width

1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)

2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1599.0 mm / 63.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1595.0 mm / 62.8 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18

6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19

Wheelbase

2850 mm / 112.2 in

Powertrain

Emission Standard

Euro 6d-Temp

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2019 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score

42%

31%

37%

Pros

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
High cargo capacity

Decent drivetrain

Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Cons

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
PHEV nonsense

Poor performance
Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.