HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Ford Mondeo 3 vs Ford Taurus 6

Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.6
1.8D
2.0
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 140hp
2.2D
2.3
2.5T
AWD
FWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/55 R16
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
12.1 m / 39.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4844 mm / 190.7 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1886 mm / 74.3 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
19 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 6F50

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
22%
21%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Interesting I5 engine option
  • Increased power output
  • Better interior appointments
  • More imposing exterior design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Arguably worse styling than Gen2
  • Limited by its basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Unreliable engines (internal water pump)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.