Compare Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 vs Ford Taurus 5
Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
FWD
AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
16%
21%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- High cargo capacity
- Rather spacious
- Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Lack of refinement
- Uninspiring exterior and interior
- Poor handling
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.